Skip to content

Cart

Your cart is empty

critique de vin se balade dans des vignes

Can you really trust wine scores? What no one tells you

In the wine world, scores make or break reputations. A 99/100 from Robert Parker, and prices skyrocket. A 14/20 in a guide, and the wine might be forgotten. But do these ratings really guarantee quality, or are they just part of a market-driven game?

If you’ve ever hesitated over a wine score, unsure whether to trust it, here’s everything you need to know before putting your faith (or not) in wine critics.


📌 Why Do Wine Scores Have So Much Power?

A wine can be excellent… but a 100/100 wine becomes a trophy.

1️⃣ A High Score = A Price Explosion

The moment a wine receives 98 or 100/100, chaos ensues:
✔️ Speculators rush in, buying to resell at a higher price.
✔️ Allocations shrink, creating artificial scarcity.
✔️ Retailers hike prices, as demand surges.

👉 The result? Some wines become unattainable—even if they’re not objectively better than lower-rated bottles.

2️⃣ Some Critics Hold Enormous Influence

A single person’s opinion can make or break a wine’s reputation. The biggest names?
✔️ Robert Parker → His rating system revolutionized the market. A 100/100 Parker wine is instantly a collector’s item.
✔️ Wine Spectator, Decanter, Jancis Robinson → Key references for both connoisseurs and investors.
✔️ La Revue du Vin de France → Primarily influences the French market.

👉 If a wine is praised by these critics, it immediately becomes sought after.


📌 Can You Really Trust Wine Scores?

🔥 Why Scores Can Be Useful
✔️ They help identify outstanding wines → A 99/100 wine is very likely to be excellent.
✔️ They provide a reference across vintages → A 100/100 Château Margaux 2010 vs. an 89/100 2013? The difference is probably real.
✔️ They guide buyers through an overwhelming selection → With thousands of wines available, a score can be a helpful shortcut.

⚠️ The Limitations (and Pitfalls) of Wine Scores
They favor a certain wine style → Critics often have personal preferences (e.g., Parker loves bold, oaky wines). A wine can be underrated just because it doesn’t match their taste.
They’re influenced by trends → Biodynamic wines, natural wines, or powerful extractions—styles that rise in popularity often receive inflated scores.
A poorly rated wine might shine under different conditions → Some wines need aging to reveal their full potential, yet they’re judged too early.

👉 Bottom line? Wine scores are a tool, but not an absolute truth.


📌 How to Use Wine Scores Wisely

1️⃣ Don’t Obsess Over the Exact Number

A 95/100 from one critic and a 92/100 from another doesn’t mean the first wine is better.

✔️ Check who gave the score → Parker, RVF, Decanter… each favors different styles.
✔️ Compare multiple sources → If a wine scores 97+ across the board, it's probably worth paying attention to.

2️⃣ Look for Consistency in a Winery

A producer with high ratings year after year is a good bet.
✔️ Example: Domaine de la Romanée-Conti, Château Latour → Always top-rated, so you know what to expect.
✔️ A winery with wildly fluctuating scores? → It might just be hype.

3️⃣ Trust Your Own Taste

A 100/100 ultra-oaky Bordeaux, but you dislike oak? Then it’s useless to you.

👉 The goal isn’t to buy the "perfect" wine—it’s to buy a wine YOU love.


📌 Should You Still Pay Attention to Wine Scores in 2024?

💡 Yes, but with perspective.
✅ They help understand the wine hierarchy.
✅ They highlight rising stars in winemaking.
✅ They affect pricing in rare wines, making them crucial for investing.

⚠️ But they shouldn’t dictate your personal preferences.
❌ A non-rated wine can be outstanding.
❌ A highly-rated wine might not suit your taste at all.

👉 Moral of the story? Wine scores are like movie reviews: they indicate a trend, but only you can decide if the experience is worth it.

Leave a comment

This site is protected by hCaptcha and the hCaptcha Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.